If the dogcraver thinks that submission
is love, than the acceptance is an act of surrender. Since everything
in his world is unconditional, the act of acceptance is, in fact, an
act of unconditional surrender. Capitulation in other words. But
since the capitulation is a form of submission it can be interpreted
as the ultimate form of submission. So their motto would be than, we
love dogs and we want to be accepted as such by the society, actually
means we control the dogs and we want to control the society.
We demand complete and unconditional
surrender of society to us.
Those people are not changing the
society, they are transforming it into something different. However
the change is not the transformation. Changing something means,
replacing it with something else with the context in mind, while the
transformation represents altering the context of that existing one.
In other words in this case, the change would be a new law that
prohibits animal abuse while the transformation would be allowing the
animal unrestricted lifestyle. It is the denial of law or the context
in which one thing exists. Again, in the case of change, the dog
attack can be seen as an act of violation of rules (either the person
was in a place where it shouldn't be or the dog was in a place where
it shouldn't be) while the transformation in this case, rules don't
exist at all to begin with, so the person and the dog can be anywhere
at all times, and the outcome of that contact is irrelevant since it
doesn't have the context. It is not defined at all either by the
circumstances or by involved parties, yet it is an act of pure chance
and randomness. The dog can be aggressive toward one person but
friendly toward many or the person can be aggressive toward one breed
but friendly toward many so each case must be seen as special and
unique with the accepted base that all dogs are good and useful while
the humans are conciousness beings that are able to think in advance
and therefore have the responsibility for their safety and the safety
of the dog. The dog, since it doesn't have the conscience cannot be
judged and is always innocent while the human can.
On that way, the human behaviour is
conditioned with the dog's unconditionality.
This transformation places the human
and the dog at the same level and it judges them equally but in the
same time the basis for that judgement is based on inequality. It
automatically assumes that the dog is not responsible and that human
is.
So how the extreme inequality, where
one side has no responsibility and other one has all the
responsibility can be considered as equal situation to begin with? It
can if you don't have the context. I know that it is messed up but I
will try to explain graphically.
The dogcraver is a person that loves
trees and the normal person loves trees also. So there is mutual
consensus, they both love trees and they agree on that one. The
dogcraver is a person that has no boundaries while the normal person
has. Since they both love trees they plant them. But the dogcraver,
since it has no boundaries starts to plant trees in the normal
person's yard and wants to plant them in his house. While the normal
person is at work, the dogcravers tears down the normal person's
house and plants trees. Than he proceeds to plant trees on the road
that leads to their homes. The trees are super trees, they grow in a
second, so the normal person heads out from work to his home and
finds the forest. At first he is surprised and cannot believe his
eyes. Than he starts to cut the trees in order to clear the way to
get to his house. The dogcraver sees that and attacks him, yelling
“Why do you kill the trees, don't you love them?How rotten you are,
you tricked me”.The normal person is confused but it is getting
late and he needs to go to his house. So he clears the path to his
house, gets to the address but the house is gone. In the same time
the dogcraver phones the Govt. and says that his neighbour has gone
insane, that he hates nature and that he is cutting down the forest
illegally. The Govt. dispatches the agents and they arrive at the
scene. The thing that they find is a man sitting and crying, the
chainsaw is still hot and above him the dogcraver points out at him
labelling him as the enemy of the nature. The normal person tries to
explain the Govt. agents that his house is gone and that road was
gone, but the agents don't believe him cause all they see is the
forest and he has cut down the forest illegally so they arrest him.
While he is in jail the dogcraver that loves trees gets promoted for
protecting the nature and becomes the president of the state cause he
cares selfishly for the nature and thus all of us. The first thing
that he does as a President is to change the sentence for the normal
person to a death penalty for cutting down the trees. So the normal
person is executed. Than he bans cutting of trees and so trees grow
without control everywhere. On the railways, on the highways, on the
airports, in the city, in the suburbia...blocking the development of
the society. The society stagnates and than crumbles down.
During this period, the dogcraver that
loves trees, is absolutely convinced that he is doing the right
thing, he loves trees.
