Following the nature of the dogcraver,
that demands safety at all costs, once the dogs became uneconomical
and were harming the lush lifestyle, they were thrown onto the
streets. This was the first thing to happen with the outbreak of
civil war. The strays have arrived.
At first, people didn't know should
they report them or not, cause they were counting that the owner
would show up and pick the dog. But he never did. The first wave of
strays suffered the most loses. Since they were not custom to the
life on the streets, many of them died of starvation, diseases or
were run over by cars. However, once whom did survived got the chance
to procreate and multiply and their numbers started to grow,
exponentially. But so did the war. The state was in the stage of
shock and the funding had to be diverted towards the war effort, so
budget cuts were made and they landed at the Animal Control desk. The
number of dogs was rising while their capacities were diminishing.
The equipment was obsolete and broken, their vehicle fleet couldn't
was over used and without spare parts. The City animal control
service was among first public services to break down and soon it
became useless. But it kept working.
The citizens would call the animal
service often but the number of calls was overwhelming so the
response time got longer and longer, and so citizens lost the faith
in the efficiency of the service. Dogs on the other hand didn't lost
any of their potency and multiplied even faster. With their numbers
growing they became more than the nuisance, they became the serious
threat. But without working service, people decided to re-domesticate
them so each part of the city had its own “guardians”. Somewhere
in the mid 90es, the first animal protection organisation was formed.
Thanks to its efforts, the citizens became friendlier toward dogs and
the number of dogs started to rise even faster. If the first half of
the 90es was characterised by packs of up to 4 dogs, the second half
of the 90es the maximum number of dogs was 10 but the minimum number
rose to 4.
But there was a change.
If in the first half of the 90es the
citizens were disappointed with the weak results of the animal
control service, thanks to the work of animal right activists, in the
second half they were openly hostile. Often they would attack
employees, burn their vehicles or simply hide the dogs. There are two
main reasons for this change of behaviour. First, the practice of the
Animal Control Service was brutal. Due to the lack of funding, it
couldn't get new equipment or re train its employees for more humane
practices, but also since the money was thin, the low wage would
attract only the most desperate and uneducated people. Those people
would than express their frustrations on the captured animals. The
second reason, was that since the Animal Control Service was the
state service it was, in a way the state itself and the citizens were
unhappy with the government. So attacking the Animal Control Service
was their way of showing their discontent with the politics and with
the Slobodan Milosevic's rule. However, this was another exercise in
futility cause the number of dogs, continued to grow and with them
the number of attacks mounted. As it was seen in Greece nowadays, the
dog became the symbol of oppression and as a victim of the system.
The people and the dogs, formed an alliance and detached themselves
from the Milosevic's thing and that was the first sign of rebellion
against the regime that will from that moment, only grow.
The people whom would do something
against the dogs were immediately associated with the regime and
labelled as backward,radical, pro-war, and evil. On the other side,
people whom protected the dogs saw themselves as progressive,
liberal,peaceful,ant-war and good. There was the third group of
people, that was against the war but also against the strays cause it
saw them as the hazard for public safety, but since the narrative was
already formed, it was attacked and dismissed by both blocks. I was
the part of that group and had ,at the time ,a solid working
experience in rescuing stray cats from the streets and moving them to
the village where they were urgently needed cause the rural areas
were de populating rapidly due to economic crisis.
The period
of the 90es is also significant cause at that time, first pit bulls
were introduced and soon they became the favourite breed for the
various bad asses and criminal structures across the Serbia. Since it
was isolated and under the economic sanctions, with the war going on,
many of the young men started to see Serbia as a ghetto and thus
identified themselves with the US ghetto gang hip hop rap culture,
especially after seeing “Boyz n the Hood” movie. The must
have accessory for them was the pit bull. They totally identified
themselves with the image of American ghetto that was portrayed in
the music videos and movies,and started to use the same slang and
dress code. They became know as the “Bro generation” cause word
bro was used excessively in every possible situation. So you had a
Serbian teenager gangsta rapper whom raps in Serbian, tries to look
like Ice Cube or Ice-T, and thinks that he lives in ghetto, while in
reality he is the son of the communist general whom got retired early
and lives in the projects that were built in the 50es.
It was like Stalin meats DMX in the
50es and I don't know if it can get more absurd than that.
"The people whom would do something against the dogs were immediately associated with the regime and labelled as backward,radical, pro-war, and evil. On the other side, people whom protected the dogs saw themselves as progressive, liberal,peaceful,ant-war and good."
ReplyDeletewere they really associated with the regime or were the dog nutters portraying them as part of the regime like they do here, calling us nazis?
it sounds like their tactics are the same on any continent and in any language.
i know that dog fighting is big in the balkans. is this a topic you plan to cover in the future?
The people that supported the Milosevic's regime were, firstly the supporters of the ORDER. What that order did, how it behaved and how damaging and destructive it was is another story. No they are not associated with the regime, not all of them but were seen by the nutters as such. That is the whole point of the dog agenda, they are not trying to improve the existing system, to make it better they seek to make a new system where dogs and them as the owners and lovers of dogs, will have no responsibility and be free to do what ever they want.
DeleteI mean, we are dealing with an international agenda here, this dog movement is like a new ideology, similar to communism, although it is not the ideology it is something much more darker and more destructive.
Of course, the dogfighting is the integral part of this story and I will write about it in the next chapters/blogs.